Bussa Law

Main Menu

Oral arguments: What's the fate of Minnesota's implied consent law?

If you follow this blog, you know that we have been tracking the recent evolution of drunk driving mandates - especially in terms of implied consent laws. The laws are subject to possible change this year, as this previous blog explains: The future of blood-alcohol tests in Minnesota.

Update: Alcohol tests in Minnesota

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on April 20, focusing on cases and laws in both Minnesota and North Dakota. The outcome could potentially affect how police carry out drunk driving investigations in states with comparable implied consent laws, which make it a crime to refuse urine, blood or breath blood-alcohol tests - even when authorities have not obtained a warrant.

Prosecutors support warrantless tests

According to prosecutors, when drivers retain a driver's license and take on local roads, they implicitly agree to alcohol testing -- even without a warrant. This is a legal requirement of the driving privilege, prosecutors contend.

Moreover, attorneys for Minnesota and North Dakota told the Supreme Court on Wednesday that it can take ample time to obtain a warrant in rural areas. In turn, this could allow time for impaired motorists to sober up.

However, Justice Sonia Sotomayor seemed to disagree. According to the Justice, the time argument is not enough to support an exception to the Fourth Amendment, which mostly prohibits warrantless searches. Justice Anthony Kennedy feels that prosecutors are requesting a grave exception to this fundamental constitutional right.

Other justices inquired as to why states could not formulate a way for authorities to use wireless technology, such as mobile phones, to quickly secure pre-test warrants.

Yet, the court appeared somewhat in support of warrantless breath tests, as breath tests are generally less invasive than blood tests. On the other hand, Justice Stephen Breyer explained, "a blood test might be a different thing." This is because there is a level of risk and pain associated with this type of test.

Only time will tell.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • What Should You Do If You Get Stopped By A Cop?

    You should not be hostile. Simply stop and allow the cop to do the cop’s job. If you are ticketed or arrested, immediately...

  • What Should You Say If You Get Stopped By A Cop?

    You have constitutional rights that you can invoke. This means that you do not have to say anything to cops, which is...

  • Can A Cop Search Your Person And/Or Your Stuff?

    A cop can search you and/or your car if a cop has probable cause to believe you pose a violent threat to the cop and/or that you...

  • What Is The Standard To Arrest You?

    A cop must have probable cause to arrest you for a crime. A cop can use the cop’s training and experience as well as his...

  • What Should You Do If You Get Served With A Search Warrant?

    The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution mandates that a cop present...

  • If Arrested, How Long Can You Be Held In Jail?

    No matter what crime you are charged with, you have 36 hours to have a bail hearing if you are in jail. This time requirement...

  • If Arrested, How Long Do You Have To Wait To Be Formally Charged?

    If you are in custody, the prosecution has 48 hours from the time of your demand to file...

  • Are All Of Your Privacy Rights Protected?

    No, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution only protects your person, your home, your papers, and your...

  • What Are The Differences Between The United States And The Minnesota Constitutions?

  • After You Are Charged, What Does The Process Entail?

    Vigorously defending your rights demands a marathon, not a sprint, mentality. Every stone must be overturned.

Learn More About Your Rights Call For A Free Consultation 218-303-5497

Free Consultations

Client Reviews

More Reviews